Criteria are applied separately to each performance area of concern identified by the educational team. Performance areas include manipulation of school related materials (hand use, organization), communication (printing, cursive, keyboarding, augmented), interpretation of body senses (self regulation, attending skills), self-maintenance (dressing, feeding, hygiene), mobility and postural control (assisted alternative positions, movement), socialization/adaptive behavior.
After identifying the performance area to be addressed. All the following criteria mustbe met to target an area for intervention by a physical or occupational therapist.
- Area of concern significantly interferes with the student’s ability to participate in the educational program.
- Area of concern appears to be caused by limitations in occupational/ physical (motor) performance components.
- Previous attempts to alleviate the concern have not been successful, as documented.
- Potential for change through intervention appears possible (e.g. change unrelated to maturity).
- Unique expertise of therapist is required to meet student’s identified need.
After reassessment, the following criteria are applied by the educational team to determine when an identified performance area (see examples above) is no longer targeted for intervention by a physical or occupational therapist.
The identified performance area must meet one of the criteria. If new performance areas are identified, the criteria are utilized as described above.
- Goals and outcomes requiring occupational or physical therapy intervention have been met and no additional goals are appropriate.
- Potential for further change as a result of therapy intervention appears unlikely.
- Area of concern ceases to be educationally relevant.
- Therapist’s intervention is contraindicated due to medical, physical, psychological or social complications.
- Unique expertise of therapist is no longer required to meet student’s identified need.